October 16, 2008

What Is the Real Poverty?

Poverty has many faces in this world of deprivation and separation from any real abundance, and many bloggers covered these conditions today in their posts, looked at strategies to overcome poverty, or wrote about being grateful for what they have and can do to make a difference.

Yet what is poverty really? What is it based on? Is there anyone in this world who will say that he, being truly loved by God, is poor? Is it possible that you could lack anything that you need when you have a true friend, when there is a whole universe that wants to give to you and does so for the mere asking? In my experience I am either poor or rich and given everything, depending on what I think I am. Depending on what I believe and hold to be true about myself. If there is a loving God, I could not possibly be lacking anything. All sense of lack would have to be my delusion of being deprived and cut off from life and happiness as God shares it with me always.

Depending on my discipline of mind, my determination to no longer side with and tolerate what is false about myself but by denying and letting go of my old ideas about the world and everyone in it, I experience myself as coming out of the darkness of this world of poverty. I am waking up from this dream of lack, need and endless seeking for what is not there. I am not a victim, and so is no one here on earth. What is true about me, is true for everyone. I am not special, but given everything by the will of God. To share what God gives is to deny poverty in any form. Nothing in this world is true, and never will be. That is what A Course In Miracles teaches me, and that is what I practice: the training of my mind to a new perception of myself and others in order to escape the bondage of the false laws of this world that would only impoverish and deny me my happiness. It is all in my hands.

Do you consider yourself or others as poor or given everything and therefore whole and complete, as powerless or powerful, as all-powerful? What do you want? This is a real question, because it all starts and ends with you. What is it that you want?



What is poverty then really? It would have to be a condition of my refusal not to answer God's calling on me to be who I am and accept His gifts to me to share them with all of my mind. The Last Unanswered Question is a section from A Course In Miracles that challenges me to overcome the false identity of a human being, offering me a new and necessarily constant because true experience instead of the poverty I find myself in in this ever changing world:

"Do you not see that all your misery comes from the strange belief that you are powerless? Being helpless is the cost of sin. Helplessness is sin's condition; the one requirement that it demands to be believed. Only the helpless could believe in it. ...

No one believes the Son of God is powerless. And those who see themselves as helpless must believe that they are not the Son of God. What can they be except his enemy? And what can they do but envy him his power, and by their envy make themselves afraid of it? These are the dark ones, silent and afraid, alone and not communicating, fearful the power of the Son of God will strike them dead, and raising up their helplessness against him. They join the army of the powerless, to wage their war of vengeance, bitterness and spite on him, to make him one with them. Because they do not know that they are one with him, they know not whom they hate. They are indeed a sorry army, each one as likely to attack his brother or turn upon himself as to remember that they thought they had a common cause.
...
The army of the powerless is weak indeed. It has no weapons and it has no enemy. Yes, it can overrun the world and seek an enemy. But it can never find what is not there. Yes, it can dream it found an enemy, but this will shift even as it attacks, so that it runs at once to find another, and never comes to rest in victory. And as it runs it turns against itself, thinking it caught a glimpse of the great enemy who always eludes its murderous attack by turning into something else. How treacherous does this enemy appear, who changes so it is impossible even to recognize him.

Yet hate must have a target. There can be no faith in sin without an enemy. Who that believes in sin would dare believe he has no enemy? Could he admit that no one made him powerless? Reason would surely bid him seek no longer what is not there to find. Yet first he must be willing to perceive a world where it is not. It is not necessary that he understand how he can see it. Nor should he try. For if he focuses on what he cannot understand, he will but emphasize his helplessness, and let sin tell him that his enemy must be himself. But let him only ask himself these questions, which he must decide, to have it done for him:

Do I desire a world I rule instead of one that rules me?
Do I desire a world where I am powerful instead of helpless?
Do I desire a world in which I have no enemies and cannot sin?
And do I want to see what I denied because it is the truth?


You may already have answered the first three questions, but not yet the last. For this one still seems fearful, and unlike the others. Yet reason would assure you they are all the same. ... This final question, which is indeed the last you need decide, still seems to hold a threat the rest have lost for you. And this imagined difference attests to your belief that truth may be the enemy you yet may find. Here, then, would seem to be the last remaining hope of finding sin, and not accepting power.

Forget not that the choice of sin or truth, helplessness or power, is the choice of whether to attack or heal. For healing comes of power, and attack of helplessness. Whom you attack you cannot want to heal. And whom you would have healed must be the one you chose to be protected from attack. And what is this decision but the choice whether to see him through the body's eyes, or let him be revealed to you through vision? How this decision leads to its effects is not your problem. But what you want to see must be your choice. This is a course in cause and not effect.

Consider carefully your answer to the last question you have left unanswered still. And let your reason tell you that it must be answered, and is answered in the other three. And then it will be clear to you that, as you look on the effects of sin in any form, all you need do is simply ask yourself:

Is this what I would see? Do I want this?

This is your one decision; this the condition for what occurs. It is irrelevant to how it happens, but not to why. You have control of this. And if you choose to see a world without an enemy, in which you are not helpless, the means to see it will be given you.

Why is the final question so important? Reason will tell you why. It is the same as are the other three, except in time. The others are decisions that can be made, and then unmade and made again. But truth is constant, and implies a state where vacillations are impossible. You can desire a world you rule that rules you not, and change your mind. You can desire to exchange your helplessness for power, and lose this same desire as a little glint of sin attracts you. And you can want to see a sinless world, and let an 'enemy' tempt you to use the body's eyes and change what you desire.

In content all the questions are the same. For each one asks if you are willing to exchange the world of sin for what the Holy Spirit sees, since it is this the world of sin denies. And therefore those who look on sin are seeing the denial of the real world. Yet the last question adds the wish for constancy in your desire to see the real world, so the desire becomes the only one you have. By answering the final question 'yes', you add sincerity to the decisions you have already made to all the rest. For only then have you renounced the option to change your mind again. When it is this you do not want, the rest are wholly answered.

Why do you think you are unsure the others have been answered? Could it be necessary they be asked so often, if they had? Until the last decision has been made, the answer is both 'yes' and 'no'. For you have answered 'yes' without perceiving that 'yes' must mean 'not no'. No one decides against his happiness, but he may do so if he does not see he does it. And if he sees his happiness as ever changing, now this, now that, and now an elusive shadow attached to nothing, he does decide against it.

Elusive happiness, or happiness in changing form that shifts with time and place, is an illusion that has no meaning. Happiness must be constant, because it is attained by giving up the wish for the inconstant. Joy cannot be perceived except through constant vision. And constant vision can be given only those who wish for constancy. The power of the Son of God's desire remains the proof that he is wrong who sees himself as helpless. Desire what you want, and you will look on it and think it real. No thought but has the power to release or kill. And none can leave the thinker's mind, or leave him unaffected."
(A Course In Miracles, Chapter 21)



Technorati-Tags: , , , , , , , ,

1 comment:

Psychic said...

Good point and insights. Really interesting indeed especially your subject.